Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12171 - 12180 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12171 - 12180 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12) 3 . We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131986 - 2017-09-21
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12) 3 . We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131986 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wells Oswalt
. 1989). Whether facts constitute a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10769 - 2005-03-31
. 1989). Whether facts constitute a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10769 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles R.P.
a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. William W., 180 Wis.2d 708, 713, 510 N.W.2d 718
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12887 - 2017-09-21
a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. William W., 180 Wis.2d 708, 713, 510 N.W.2d 718
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12887 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 912 (1998)). We review de novo whether a defendant was denied due process at sentencing. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157817 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 912 (1998)). We review de novo whether a defendant was denied due process at sentencing. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157817 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Nathan appeals. Discussion ¶4 We review de novo whether the circuit court followed proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658241 - 2023-05-24
. Nathan appeals. Discussion ¶4 We review de novo whether the circuit court followed proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658241 - 2023-05-24
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
Mark Grebner v. Sharon Schiebel
interpret Wis. Stat. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2680 - 2005-03-31
interpret Wis. Stat. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2680 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Popke, 317 Wis. 2d 118, ¶10 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22
facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Popke, 317 Wis. 2d 118, ¶10 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 207, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We then review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71767 - 2011-10-03
, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 207, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We then review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71767 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Wilder
), STATS.; State v. Harris, 206 Wis.2d 242, 249, 557 N.W.2d 245, 248 (1996). We review de novo a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10563 - 2017-09-20
), STATS.; State v. Harris, 206 Wis.2d 242, 249, 557 N.W.2d 245, 248 (1996). We review de novo a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10563 - 2017-09-20