Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12181 - 12190 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12181 - 12190 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
State v. Timothy Zeilinger
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
). Whether the trial court complied with § 48.315 in this case is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2190 - 2005-03-31
). Whether the trial court complied with § 48.315 in this case is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2190 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75824 - 2011-12-28
of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75824 - 2011-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶30. ¶14 The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶30. ¶14 The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
Ronald Waites v. Marianne Cooke
prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10516 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10516 - 2005-03-31
John A. Zulliger v. Town of Harding
appeal the judgment dismissing their amended complaint against the State.[4] ¶4 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2482 - 2005-03-31
appeal the judgment dismissing their amended complaint against the State.[4] ¶4 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2482 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Bolstad
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8484 - 2005-03-31
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8484 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott R. Weber
to construe §§ 973.09(1)(b) and 973.20, Stats. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
to construe §§ 973.09(1)(b) and 973.20, Stats. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
C & B Investments v. Wisconsin Winnebago Health Department
We review de novo whether the agencies of the Winnebago Nation waived their sovereign immunity. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7705 - 2005-03-31
We review de novo whether the agencies of the Winnebago Nation waived their sovereign immunity. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sheboygan County v. Cheryl L. M.
de novo. K.N.K., 139 Wis. 2d at 198. ¶8 The commitment extension of an individual is regulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3682 - 2017-09-19
de novo. K.N.K., 139 Wis. 2d at 198. ¶8 The commitment extension of an individual is regulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3682 - 2017-09-19