Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12181 - 12190 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12181 - 12190 of 30123 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶13, 325 Wis. 2d 1, 784 N.W.2d 513. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-16
that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶13, 325 Wis. 2d 1, 784 N.W.2d 513. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-16
State v. Warren J. Hampton
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26265 - 2006-08-21
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26265 - 2006-08-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. On appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. On appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of which present questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Driehaus v. Walworth Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77630 - 2014-09-15
of which present questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Driehaus v. Walworth Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77630 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factual findings under the clearly erroneous standard, but we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=302086 - 2020-11-11
factual findings under the clearly erroneous standard, but we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=302086 - 2020-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
919. We review de novo whether applying the statute to a particular fact situation deprives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179943 - 2017-09-21
919. We review de novo whether applying the statute to a particular fact situation deprives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179943 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264312 - 2020-06-16
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264312 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Escalona bar is reviewed de novo). ¶5 Randle alleged that he did not raise this issue previously because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36431 - 2014-09-15
of Escalona bar is reviewed de novo). ¶5 Randle alleged that he did not raise this issue previously because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36431 - 2014-09-15