Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 6309 for 208.

2009 WI APP 5
following a successful attack on an invalid sentence. See State v. Carter, 208 Wis. 2d 142, 154-55, 560 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35025 - 2009-01-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 208, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89341 - 2014-09-15

State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
2002 WI App 208 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2969-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13518 - 2017-09-21

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Roger H. Schuett
the intent of the legislature in creating it. See Anderson v. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis.2d 18, 25, 559 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12206 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph Williams
in Williams’s co-defendant’s case, State v. Green, 208 Wis.2d 290, 560 N.W.2d 295 (Ct. App. 1997). In Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Caterpillar, Inc.
and its application to undisputed or stipulated facts are questions of law. Truttschel v. Martin, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2211 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Joseph Williams
in Williams’s co-defendant’s case, State v. Green, 208 Wis.2d 290, 560 N.W.2d 295 (Ct. App. 1997). In Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11239 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, then the double jeopardy clause prohibits an increase in that sentence. State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 208, ¶9, 257
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34444 - 2008-11-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and article I, section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution. See State v. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 208, 589
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244070 - 2019-07-23