Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Jon R. Woodard v. Pammy L. Woodard
was still in Afghanistan. His military pay was being deposited into a joint bank account he shared with Pam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7142 - 2005-05-09
was still in Afghanistan. His military pay was being deposited into a joint bank account he shared with Pam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7142 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a pretrial motion to suppress evidence; and that his trial counsel was ineffective in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17
to file a pretrial motion to suppress evidence; and that his trial counsel was ineffective in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a pretrial motion to suppress evidence; and that his trial counsel was ineffective in both cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17
to file a pretrial motion to suppress evidence; and that his trial counsel was ineffective in both cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Harry also removed Darlene’s name from some joint accounts they had and retitled those joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143772 - 2017-09-21
. Harry also removed Darlene’s name from some joint accounts they had and retitled those joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143772 - 2017-09-21
Internal Operating Procedures
Calendars. 6 (3) Motions and Petitions for Leave to Appeal. 7 (4) Submission. 8 (5) Opinions. 10 (6
/ca/iop/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50229 - 2010-05-17
Calendars. 6 (3) Motions and Petitions for Leave to Appeal. 7 (4) Submission. 8 (5) Opinions. 10 (6
/ca/iop/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50229 - 2010-05-17
State v. Lee D. Worby
motion.[2] The issue on appeal is whether a “neutral and detached magistrate” sentenced Worby. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31
motion.[2] The issue on appeal is whether a “neutral and detached magistrate” sentenced Worby. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lee D. Worby
heard the postconviction motion and entered the order denying postconviction relief. No(s). 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2917 - 2017-09-19
heard the postconviction motion and entered the order denying postconviction relief. No(s). 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2917 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 206
, the parties originally agreed to joint legal custody of the three children and agreed that the primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29972 - 2014-09-15
, the parties originally agreed to joint legal custody of the three children and agreed that the primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29972 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI App 206
, the parties originally agreed to joint legal custody of the three children and agreed that the primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29972 - 2007-09-25
, the parties originally agreed to joint legal custody of the three children and agreed that the primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29972 - 2007-09-25
Frontsheet
), and that he engaged in conversion of funds from a joint checking account that he and Johnnie opened prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29564 - 2007-07-02
), and that he engaged in conversion of funds from a joint checking account that he and Johnnie opened prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29564 - 2007-07-02