Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 6253 for cf.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 6253 for cf.
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Collins
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2632-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-43 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4439 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2632-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-43 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4439 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott E. Laituri
. Appeal No. 03-3045-CR Cir. Ct. No. 02-CF-48 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7041 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 03-3045-CR Cir. Ct. No. 02-CF-48 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7041 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ardie Byrd
addressed Byrd regarding the charges and the penalties: THE COURT: In case 94-CF-1710, I’m -- let
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31
addressed Byrd regarding the charges and the penalties: THE COURT: In case 94-CF-1710, I’m -- let
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
by affirmations of the will’s existence by the testator. Cf. Quantius v. Cotter, 47 Wis.2d 769, 779, 178 N.W.2d 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
by affirmations of the will’s existence by the testator. Cf. Quantius v. Cotter, 47 Wis.2d 769, 779, 178 N.W.2d 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transporation
a property interest or right to occupy the property in perpetuity. Cf., Capital Invests., Inc. v. Whitehall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10734 - 2017-09-20
a property interest or right to occupy the property in perpetuity. Cf., Capital Invests., Inc. v. Whitehall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10734 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and then, if necessary, by writ of certiorari to the circuit court. Cf. State ex rel. Curtis v. Litscher, 2002 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217332 - 2018-08-03
, and then, if necessary, by writ of certiorari to the circuit court. Cf. State ex rel. Curtis v. Litscher, 2002 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217332 - 2018-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Cf. State v. Raczka, 2018 WI App 3, ¶8, 379 Wis. 2d 720, 906 N.W.2d 722. To convict Thao
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336533 - 2021-02-23
. Cf. State v. Raczka, 2018 WI App 3, ¶8, 379 Wis. 2d 720, 906 N.W.2d 722. To convict Thao
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336533 - 2021-02-23
State v. Richard Stensvad
a clearly erroneous standard. See § 805.17(2), Stats.; cf. State v. Jefferson, 163 Wis.2d 332, 338, 471 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31
a clearly erroneous standard. See § 805.17(2), Stats.; cf. State v. Jefferson, 163 Wis.2d 332, 338, 471 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maxine Anderson
. Appeal No. 01-0520-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-552 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3650 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 01-0520-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-552 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert L. Worthon v. Jeffrey Endicott
contrary testimony. Cf. Saenz v. Young, 811 F.2d 1172, 1174 (7th Cir. 1987). The No. 94-3326
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8399 - 2017-09-19
contrary testimony. Cf. Saenz v. Young, 811 F.2d 1172, 1174 (7th Cir. 1987). The No. 94-3326
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8399 - 2017-09-19