Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Dane County Courthouse Electronic Notice Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice Jennifer L
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772930 - 2024-03-07
Dane County Courthouse Electronic Notice Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice Jennifer L
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772930 - 2024-03-07
R & M Markets, Inc. v. Spatz Centers, Inc.
, including the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal question which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10565 - 2005-03-31
, including the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal question which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10565 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a judge is a “neutral and detached magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92654 - 2013-02-12
a judge is a “neutral and detached magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92654 - 2013-02-12
Amusement Devices, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
The parties differ over our standard of review. Amusement Devices argues that we should review the issue de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3246 - 2005-03-31
The parties differ over our standard of review. Amusement Devices argues that we should review the issue de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3246 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
demonstrates Padilla is not entitled to relief. We review de novo whether Padilla’s motion alleged sufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17
demonstrates Padilla is not entitled to relief. We review de novo whether Padilla’s motion alleged sufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Daniel Edward Holman
a trial de novo. The circuit court responded that Holman was going to get a jury trial. A final pre
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13034 - 2017-09-21
a trial de novo. The circuit court responded that Holman was going to get a jury trial. A final pre
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Reginald Terry v. Gary McCaughtry
). We review summary judgment orders de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10369 - 2017-09-20
). We review summary judgment orders de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10369 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48003 - 2014-09-15
from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48003 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
At a trial de novo, the circuit court found that Village Storage and Erdmann had orally modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105378 - 2017-09-21
At a trial de novo, the circuit court found that Village Storage and Erdmann had orally modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105378 - 2017-09-21
Reginald Terry v. Gary McCaughtry
judgment orders de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10369 - 2005-03-31
judgment orders de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10369 - 2005-03-31