Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 29429 for er.

[PDF] Robert C. McRoberts, Jr. v. Toni L. Kant
court erred when it concluded that equitable estoppel barred Mason Shoe from recovering its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24853 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
motion. Gumieny argues the trial court erred by permitting the State to cross-examine him concerning his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26882 - 2006-10-23

COURT OF APPEALS
of protection and services and placing them in the home of Camille Y.[2] He contends the court erred by: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28749 - 2007-04-18

[PDF] State v. Deshawn Rodgers
a postconviction order denying his motion to modify his sentence. Rodgers claims: (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9683 - 2017-09-19

State v. James R. Coleman
. In his appeal, Coleman claims that the trial court erred when it admitted the “other acts” testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10258 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James E. Powell
claims that the trial court erred by: (1) ruling on the number of prior 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9474 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
court erred in making its contempt finding because: (1) she was the “primary caretaker” of the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108476 - 2014-02-26

Robert C. McRoberts, Jr. v. Toni L. Kant
the circuit court erred when it concluded that equitable estoppel barred Mason Shoe from recovering its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24853 - 2006-04-17

[PDF] NOTICE
his postconviction motion. Gumieny argues the trial court erred by permitting the State to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26882 - 2014-09-15

William Charles Sharp v. Thomas M. Hughes
’ and Hugheses’ properties. The Sharps argue the trial court erred when it concluded the Hugheses had record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18163 - 2005-05-16