Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 2437 for nys.

[PDF] John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
§ 88.87(2)(c), STATS., provides in relevant part: [A]ny property owner damaged by the highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9562 - 2017-09-19

Ambrose H. Wilger v. Dodge County Planning and Development Department
a purpose customarily incidental to the principal structure,” and defines “structure” as “[a]ny erection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14135 - 2005-03-31

Brown County v. Jessica M.
a continuance for “[a]ny nonpetitioning party … for the purpose of consulting with an attorney on the request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6634 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Theresa M. Young v. Aurora Medical Center of Washington County, Inc.
[a]ny applicable statute of limitations is tolled on the date the director of state courts receives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6091 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
ordinances. WISCONSIN STAT. § 806.04(2) provides that “[a]ny person … whose rights, status or other legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27536 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 73
there exists ... [a]ny facility for children.” VILLAGE OF MENOMONEE FALLS, WIS., CODE OF ORDINANCES § 62-51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63155 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
compliance with,” as relevant here, “[a]ny … town… ordinance that is in effect when the subdivider submits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1086593 - 2026-03-05

[PDF] WI APP 139
informed proposers that “[a]ny contact with State employees concerning this RFP is prohibited, except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70462 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
consider such a charge at all.[2] However, Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1g)(b) defines a read-in charge as: [a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30433 - 2007-10-02

[PDF] Catharine M. Lawton v. Town of Barton
in meetings in violation of the open meetings law. See WIS. STAT. § 19.96 (providing that “[a]ny member
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7364 - 2017-09-20