Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 96750 for state case.

[PDF] State v. Sandra K.T.
. Sandra did not testify and rested when the State closed its case. The State first called Rick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10703 - 2017-09-20

State v. Terrence Miller
of this case are similar to those presented in State v. Young, 212 Wis.2d 417, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14785 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Isaac Hughes
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed. STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3304 - 2017-09-19

State v. Cedric Johnson
Complete Title of Case: † Petition for Review filed. State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10885 - 2005-03-31

State v. Iran Shuttlesworth
of the DNA in the T.F. case. Instead, the State relied on the supplementary report’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16201 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Iran Shuttlesworth
that WIS. STAT. § 972.11, WIS. STAT. RULE 901.04, and governing case law require the State to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16201 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph Steffes
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed. State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Benard Treadwell
car, actually corroborates the other evidence supporting the State’s case against Treadwell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12165 - 2014-09-15

State v. Neona C.
that the State’s inability to depose her “did not mean its ability to present its case was ‘totally frustrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6608 - 2005-03-31

State v. Neona C.
that the State’s inability to depose her “did not mean its ability to present its case was ‘totally frustrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6609 - 2005-03-31