Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 50415 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 50415 for writ of certiorari forms.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, J. Vincent Martinez appeals pro se from an order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
, J. Vincent Martinez appeals pro se from an order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a circuit court order that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
a circuit court order that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons discussed below, we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons discussed below, we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
[PDF]
Mark Price v. Gary R. McCaughtry
dismissing his petition for certiorari review of a prison disciplinary decision. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2675 - 2017-09-19
dismissing his petition for certiorari review of a prison disciplinary decision. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2675 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 64
should have reviewed the Town’s decision applying certiorari review because WIS. STAT. § 74.35(3)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726104 - 2024-01-18
should have reviewed the Town’s decision applying certiorari review because WIS. STAT. § 74.35(3)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726104 - 2024-01-18
Daniel Frasch v. Marianne A. Cooke
. The Department contends that Frasch is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) Frasch did not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
. The Department contends that Frasch is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) Frasch did not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Knight petition with this court seeking a writ of habeas corpus to reinstate his direct appeal rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
Knight petition with this court seeking a writ of habeas corpus to reinstate his direct appeal rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Roger Blacksheaer
that conclusion, we note that Swinson does not ask, if we conclude certiorari is the appropriate form of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21786 - 2006-03-15
that conclusion, we note that Swinson does not ask, if we conclude certiorari is the appropriate form of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21786 - 2006-03-15
[PDF]
Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Roger Blacksheaer
certiorari is the appropriate form of review, that we remand the matter to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21786 - 2017-09-21
certiorari is the appropriate form of review, that we remand the matter to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21786 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
to challenge an administrative order revoking probation, since a writ of certiorari is available
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17551 - 2017-09-21
to challenge an administrative order revoking probation, since a writ of certiorari is available
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17551 - 2017-09-21