Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12201 - 12210 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
de novo the application of the constitutional principles to those facts. State v. Kramer, 2008 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757351 - 2024-01-30

Manitowoc County v. Leesa J.Y.
a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
statute and apply it to specific facts. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31934 - 2008-02-25

[PDF] State v. Allen Tony Davis
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id., 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15911 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Black River Country Bank v. Wisconsin Commissioner of Banking
nearly one of first impression. Id. at 291, 485 N.W.2d at 259. The lowest level of review is the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9134 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. We review de novo whether exclusion of evidence implicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110702 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Roberta L. Brunell v. Miljevich Corporation
. Doughboy Recreational, 160 Wis.2d 547, 559, 466 N.W.2d 897, 902 (1991). Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14308 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Manitowoc County v. Leesa J.Y.
on the merits. We review a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14347 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court satisfy the standard of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
relief is a question of the law that we review de novo.” See State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6, 258
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364322 - 2021-05-11