Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12201 - 12210 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12201 - 12210 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. David L.W.
review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311, 313 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12151 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311, 313 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12151 - 2005-03-31
Terry and Cathy Laube v. City of Owen
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984). The plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11456 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984). The plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11456 - 2005-03-31
Mary Fredette v. Wood County National Bank
support a conclusion of frivolousness under § 814.025 is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8713 - 2005-03-31
support a conclusion of frivolousness under § 814.025 is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8713 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven W. Anderson
facts to the law will be reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶17, __ Wis. 2d __, 646 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5136 - 2005-03-31
facts to the law will be reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶17, __ Wis. 2d __, 646 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5136 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as a circuit court. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017327 - 2025-10-02
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as a circuit court. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017327 - 2025-10-02
State v. Vernon L. Hubbard
). Whether the established facts constitute probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4707 - 2005-03-31
). Whether the established facts constitute probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4707 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. Glenn C. Kimpel
, which we review de novo on appeal. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16068 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo on appeal. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16068 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Allen Bruski
evaluate those facts against the constitutional standard de novo. Id. ¶12 When we assess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-03-22
evaluate those facts against the constitutional standard de novo. Id. ¶12 When we assess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances. We decide de novo whether those facts pass constitutional muster. See State v. Jerrell C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32296 - 2008-03-31
circumstances. We decide de novo whether those facts pass constitutional muster. See State v. Jerrell C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32296 - 2008-03-31