Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12201 - 12210 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12201 - 12210 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. N.
into her vagina on multiple occasions. At trial, the State presented Cassie’s videotaped statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6956 - 2017-09-20
into her vagina on multiple occasions. At trial, the State presented Cassie’s videotaped statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6956 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Curtis Ellis, Jr.
, contending that the trial court erred when it denied suppression of two statements he gave to police. Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7990 - 2017-09-19
, contending that the trial court erred when it denied suppression of two statements he gave to police. Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7990 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael P. N.
presented Cassie’s videotaped statement of the abuse, and Cassie affirmed portions of her account on cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6956 - 2005-03-31
presented Cassie’s videotaped statement of the abuse, and Cassie affirmed portions of her account on cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6956 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the challenged statement is testimonial or non-testimonial. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45162 - 2009-12-29
the challenged statement is testimonial or non-testimonial. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45162 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
whether the challenged statement is testimonial or non-testimonial. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45162 - 2014-09-15
whether the challenged statement is testimonial or non-testimonial. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45162 - 2014-09-15
State v. Harold S. Fields
erroneously exercised its discretion when it admitted Deng Yang’s hearsay statement into evidence during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14333 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion when it admitted Deng Yang’s hearsay statement into evidence during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14333 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
/Waiver of Rights form, a check mark was placed next to a statement that explained read-in charges
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33125 - 2008-06-18
/Waiver of Rights form, a check mark was placed next to a statement that explained read-in charges
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33125 - 2008-06-18
[PDF]
WI 65
On the completed Plea Questionnaire/Waiver of Rights form, a check mark was placed next to a statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33125 - 2014-09-15
On the completed Plea Questionnaire/Waiver of Rights form, a check mark was placed next to a statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33125 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
erred when it denied No. 2008AP2401-CR 2 his motion to suppress his custodial statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37012 - 2014-09-15
erred when it denied No. 2008AP2401-CR 2 his motion to suppress his custodial statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37012 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress his custodial statements. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37012 - 2005-04-06
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress his custodial statements. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37012 - 2005-04-06