Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12201 - 12210 of 40037 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 12201 - 12210 of 40037 for financial disclosure statements.
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
and withdraw his pleas.[1] He argues that the court erred in ruling that: (1) statements he made to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
and withdraw his pleas.[1] He argues that the court erred in ruling that: (1) statements he made to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
and withdraw his pleas.[1] He argues that the court erred in ruling that: (1) statements he made to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31
and withdraw his pleas.[1] He argues that the court erred in ruling that: (1) statements he made to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Najee S. Hudson moved to exclude as evidence all oral and written statements he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778506 - 2024-03-21
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Najee S. Hudson moved to exclude as evidence all oral and written statements he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778506 - 2024-03-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order suppressing an audiovisual statement of a child victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48635 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order suppressing an audiovisual statement of a child victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48635 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order suppressing an audiovisual statement of a child victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48635 - 2010-04-05
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order suppressing an audiovisual statement of a child victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48635 - 2010-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State referred the court to a 2003 victim impact statement that had been filed by the mother of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
, the State referred the court to a 2003 victim impact statement that had been filed by the mother of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
At the resentencing, the State referred the court to a 2003 victim impact statement that had been filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15
At the resentencing, the State referred the court to a 2003 victim impact statement that had been filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ronald E. Dion
court’s exclusion of a prior consistent statement he made to his original defense attorney and the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3593 - 2005-03-31
court’s exclusion of a prior consistent statement he made to his original defense attorney and the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3593 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald E. Dion
of the other parent. Dion challenges the trial court’s exclusion of a prior consistent statement he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3593 - 2017-09-19
of the other parent. Dion challenges the trial court’s exclusion of a prior consistent statement he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3593 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in his defense; and (6) he was not provided copies of confidential informant statements. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62851 - 2014-09-15
in his defense; and (6) he was not provided copies of confidential informant statements. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62851 - 2014-09-15