Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12211 - 12220 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 12211 - 12220 of 33989 for dismissal.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Felski first contends postconviction counsel ineffectively failed to move to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140695 - 2017-09-21
arguable merit. Felski first contends postconviction counsel ineffectively failed to move to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140695 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
delivery counts. Other charges against Cooper were dismissed. ¶5 In a postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180869 - 2017-09-21
delivery counts. Other charges against Cooper were dismissed. ¶5 In a postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180869 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Birdsall
report but then voluntarily dismissed that appeal. Accordingly, this matter is now before this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31
report but then voluntarily dismissed that appeal. Accordingly, this matter is now before this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31
North Central Forklift, Inc. v. T.J. Brownson
to dismiss the action. At this point, Brownson reiterated his position that if the claim was no longer under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15951 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss the action. At this point, Brownson reiterated his position that if the claim was no longer under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15951 - 2005-03-31
State v. Fitzroy Donaldson
. The appeal was dismissed so that he could file a postconviction motion. In January 1996, he filed a pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13410 - 2005-03-31
. The appeal was dismissed so that he could file a postconviction motion. In January 1996, he filed a pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13410 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Slaughter
. Daniel Slaughter appeals from a nonfinal order denying his motion to dismiss the information charging him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8516 - 2005-03-31
. Daniel Slaughter appeals from a nonfinal order denying his motion to dismiss the information charging him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8516 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 28, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
charges would be dismissed but read in for sentencing purposes. Two of the charges involved allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32811 - 2008-05-27
charges would be dismissed but read in for sentencing purposes. Two of the charges involved allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32811 - 2008-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed the count of violating a domestic abuse injunction. The State agreed to recommend an unspecified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
dismissed the count of violating a domestic abuse injunction. The State agreed to recommend an unspecified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
State v. John W. Moore
(Paragraph 4). Moore notes this as a pre-trial issue. Moore moved to dismiss the complaint, and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14546 - 2017-09-21
(Paragraph 4). Moore notes this as a pre-trial issue. Moore moved to dismiss the complaint, and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be dismissed. ¶4 In November 2008, formal charges against Bach unrelated to the earlier investigation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75493 - 2014-09-15
be dismissed. ¶4 In November 2008, formal charges against Bach unrelated to the earlier investigation were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75493 - 2014-09-15