Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12221 - 12230 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
and 814.29. Statutory interpretation and application are questions of law that an appellate court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86384 - 2012-08-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law reviewed de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. If a defendant’s postconviction motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Balliette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140563 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jessica L. Edwardson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
¶7 Whether a duty exists in a case is a question of law that we review de novo. See First Nat’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16086 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
). On appeal, the court of appeals reviews de novo whether the circuit court properly interpreted the insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101773 - 2013-09-10

[PDF] Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
. The interpretation of a document is a question of law that we review de novo. See Delap v. Institute of America
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20

10AP2995 County of Sheboygan v. Jeffrey L. Bubolz.doc
. The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62146 - 2011-04-05

[PDF] State v. Wayne Cornelius
the State’s claim that these theories were never presented to the jury. An appeal is not a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18658 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael G. Costigan
facts satisfy the constitutional requirements presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Tyeshawn D. Cohens
of Cohens’ 2000 drug dealing had a de minimus effect on the jury because of the overwhelming evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6543 - 2017-09-19