Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12221 - 12230 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12221 - 12230 of 30123 for de.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of which present questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Driehaus v. Walworth Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77630 - 2014-09-15
of which present questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Driehaus v. Walworth Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77630 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factual findings under the clearly erroneous standard, but we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=302086 - 2020-11-11
factual findings under the clearly erroneous standard, but we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=302086 - 2020-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
919. We review de novo whether applying the statute to a particular fact situation deprives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179943 - 2017-09-21
919. We review de novo whether applying the statute to a particular fact situation deprives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179943 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264312 - 2020-06-16
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264312 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Escalona bar is reviewed de novo). ¶5 Randle alleged that he did not raise this issue previously because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36431 - 2014-09-15
of Escalona bar is reviewed de novo). ¶5 Randle alleged that he did not raise this issue previously because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36431 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
are reviewed de novo. See State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44852 - 2014-09-15
are reviewed de novo. See State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44852 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Craig J. Anderson
, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. To prove deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12555 - 2017-09-21
, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. To prove deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Irving Washington
this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. We conclude that Washington has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12646 - 2017-09-21
this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. We conclude that Washington has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12646 - 2017-09-21