Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12221 - 12230 of 65726 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 12221 - 12230 of 65726 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Luther Williams
) (1997-98),[2] the hearsay exception for a record of regularly conducted activity (business record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16440 - 2005-03-31
) (1997-98),[2] the hearsay exception for a record of regularly conducted activity (business record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terrance W. Walther
review of confidential records of the child whose complaint led to criminal charges against him. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15836 - 2017-09-21
review of confidential records of the child whose complaint led to criminal charges against him. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15836 - 2017-09-21
State v. Terrance W. Walther
of confidential records of the child whose complaint led to criminal charges against him.[1] Walther argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15836 - 2005-03-31
of confidential records of the child whose complaint led to criminal charges against him.[1] Walther argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15836 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-five years from recording and automatically extended for ten-year periods thereafter “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53348 - 2010-08-17
-five years from recording and automatically extended for ten-year periods thereafter “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53348 - 2010-08-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39785 - 2014-09-15
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366096 - 2021-05-13
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366096 - 2021-05-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
for twenty-five years from recording and automatically extended for ten-year periods thereafter “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53348 - 2014-09-15
for twenty-five years from recording and automatically extended for ten-year periods thereafter “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53348 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39785 - 2009-08-19
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39785 - 2009-08-19
State v. Joseph M. Rucker
the juvenile court and probation records of two alleged accomplices; (4) erroneously exercised discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10993 - 2005-03-31
the juvenile court and probation records of two alleged accomplices; (4) erroneously exercised discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
to grant a motion for reconsideration once the record of the case had been certified to the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14295 - 2014-09-15
to grant a motion for reconsideration once the record of the case had been certified to the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14295 - 2014-09-15