Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12231 - 12240 of 40186 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12231 - 12240 of 40186 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Rogers argues that his motion to suppress his statement should have been granted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19
postconviction motion. Rogers argues that his motion to suppress his statement should have been granted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppressing oral statements made to law enforcement by Allen Arthur Jessel. After reviewing the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729516 - 2023-11-16
suppressing oral statements made to law enforcement by Allen Arthur Jessel. After reviewing the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729516 - 2023-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppressing oral statements made to law enforcement by Allen Arthur Jessel. After reviewing the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729516 - 2023-11-16
suppressing oral statements made to law enforcement by Allen Arthur Jessel. After reviewing the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729516 - 2023-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Curtis Ellis, Jr.
, contending that the trial court erred when it denied suppression of two statements he gave to police. Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7990 - 2017-09-19
, contending that the trial court erred when it denied suppression of two statements he gave to police. Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7990 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael P. N.
presented Cassie’s videotaped statement of the abuse, and Cassie affirmed portions of her account on cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6956 - 2005-03-31
presented Cassie’s videotaped statement of the abuse, and Cassie affirmed portions of her account on cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. N.
into her vagina on multiple occasions. At trial, the State presented Cassie’s videotaped statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6956 - 2017-09-20
into her vagina on multiple occasions. At trial, the State presented Cassie’s videotaped statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6956 - 2017-09-20
State v. Curtis Ellis, Jr.
, contending that the trial court erred when it denied suppression of two statements he gave to police. Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7990 - 2005-03-31
, contending that the trial court erred when it denied suppression of two statements he gave to police. Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7990 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the challenged statement is testimonial or non-testimonial. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45162 - 2009-12-29
the challenged statement is testimonial or non-testimonial. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45162 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
whether the challenged statement is testimonial or non-testimonial. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45162 - 2014-09-15
whether the challenged statement is testimonial or non-testimonial. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45162 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven M. Sosinski
that the trial court erred in admitting the victim's prior consistent statements into evidence. Sosinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8340 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred in admitting the victim's prior consistent statements into evidence. Sosinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8340 - 2017-09-19