Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12231 - 12240 of 40171 for financial disclosure statements.

[PDF] State v. Stanley A. Samuel
-in-chief a prior statement of a hostile prosecution witness who then claimed No. 99-2587-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16059 - 2017-09-21

State v. Stanley A. Samuel
introduced into its case-in-chief a prior statement of a hostile prosecution witness who then claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16059 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with a hammer. Additionally, police introduced statements of KM, who did not appear at trial, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461713 - 2021-12-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
was ineffective for failing to introduce incuplatory statements by another person that would tend to exculpate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95673 - 2013-04-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
attorney was ineffective for failing to introduce incuplatory statements by another person that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95673 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to a child. He entered a no-contest plea after the court denied his motion to suppress statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89394 - 2012-11-19

Lamonte Simmons v. Jeffrey Endicott
also argues that he was found guilty on the basis of informant statements which should not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David D. Breitenfeld
Breitenfeld's objection, the trial court admitted Breitenfeld's 1989 written statement admitting sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10663 - 2017-09-20

State v. David D. Breitenfeld
written statement admitting sexual activities with children six-years before the charged offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10663 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
statement during its case-in-chief. In addition, he argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29783 - 2007-07-23