Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12241 - 12250 of 34031 for dismissal.
Search results 12241 - 12250 of 34031 for dismissal.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rogstad moved to: (1) dismiss the charges, challenging the court’s bind-over conclusion; (2) modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144424 - 2015-07-13
. Rogstad moved to: (1) dismiss the charges, challenging the court’s bind-over conclusion; (2) modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144424 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
Justin Pichler v. United States Fire Insurance Company
granting summary judgment in favor of the Hamilton School District, dismissing the Pichlers’ complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14002 - 2014-09-15
granting summary judgment in favor of the Hamilton School District, dismissing the Pichlers’ complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14002 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial, the State moved to dismiss the harassment charge, citing “evidentiary concerns” and asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
trial, the State moved to dismiss the harassment charge, citing “evidentiary concerns” and asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit reports, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend the time for Newson to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486932 - 2022-02-18
the no-merit reports, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend the time for Newson to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486932 - 2022-02-18
WI App 132 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2191-CR Complete Titl...
crimes. Carl A. Reed pled no contest to substantial battery in exchange for the dismissal of three other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103245 - 2013-11-19
crimes. Carl A. Reed pled no contest to substantial battery in exchange for the dismissal of three other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103245 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment dismissing his action for implied contract/quantum meruit and unjust enrichment against his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107933 - 2017-09-21
judgment dismissing his action for implied contract/quantum meruit and unjust enrichment against his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107933 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael J. Jordan
SCHUDSON, J.[1] Michael J. Jordan appeals from a nonfinal order denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6508 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] Michael J. Jordan appeals from a nonfinal order denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6508 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Converse
On April 23, 1998, the court of appeals dismissed the client's criminal appeal for failure to file a brief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16789 - 2005-03-31
On April 23, 1998, the court of appeals dismissed the client's criminal appeal for failure to file a brief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16789 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s dismissal of its claims for entitlement to an easement. Specifically, FAWD claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379749 - 2021-06-22
court’s dismissal of its claims for entitlement to an easement. Specifically, FAWD claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379749 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At sentencing, the State moved to dismiss count two—substantial battery—because it was a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607977 - 2023-01-10
. At sentencing, the State moved to dismiss count two—substantial battery—because it was a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607977 - 2023-01-10