Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12241 - 12250 of 73646 for we.
Search results 12241 - 12250 of 73646 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for custody served as a condition of No. 2011AP1372-CR 2 probation. We agree with Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89187 - 2014-09-15
for custody served as a condition of No. 2011AP1372-CR 2 probation. We agree with Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89187 - 2014-09-15
State v. Derrick Emerson
enhancer, arguing that the court failed to comply with statutory sentencing requirements. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
enhancer, arguing that the court failed to comply with statutory sentencing requirements. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
additionally requests a new trial in the interests of justice. We reject Schmelzle’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
additionally requests a new trial in the interests of justice. We reject Schmelzle’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a supplemental motion. We conclude that No. 2007AP2124 2 Claudio’s motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34384 - 2014-09-15
a supplemental motion. We conclude that No. 2007AP2124 2 Claudio’s motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
State v. Ray A. Schiller
evidentiary rulings; and that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3901 - 2005-03-31
evidentiary rulings; and that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3901 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the arrest. We affirm the order. ¶2 The test for probable cause in this context is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34375 - 2008-10-22
for the arrest. We affirm the order. ¶2 The test for probable cause in this context is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34375 - 2008-10-22
GreenStone Farm Credit Services v. Robert M. Giesler
an order denying him attorney fees to which he claimed entitlement as the prevailing party. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18265 - 2005-05-23
an order denying him attorney fees to which he claimed entitlement as the prevailing party. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18265 - 2005-05-23
CA Blank Order
account titled in La Roche’s name. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123951 - 2014-10-09
account titled in La Roche’s name. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123951 - 2014-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
without holding a hearing, and that it made other errors. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28812 - 2014-09-15
without holding a hearing, and that it made other errors. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28812 - 2014-09-15