Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12251 - 12260 of 34001 for dismissed.
Search results 12251 - 12260 of 34001 for dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed the count of violating a domestic abuse injunction. The State agreed to recommend an unspecified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
dismissed the count of violating a domestic abuse injunction. The State agreed to recommend an unspecified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no contest to four charges, and the other three would be dismissed and read in. The State agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
no contest to four charges, and the other three would be dismissed and read in. The State agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
[PDF]
Thomas M. Giebel v. Curt W. Richards
court erred: (1) in failing to include the arsonist on the verdict; (2) in not dismissing the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12763 - 2017-09-21
court erred: (1) in failing to include the arsonist on the verdict; (2) in not dismissing the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12763 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court order denying his motion to dismiss these charges. Barber argues that the State is barred from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27228 - 2006-11-21
court order denying his motion to dismiss these charges. Barber argues that the State is barred from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27228 - 2006-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: SCOTT R. NEEDHAM, Judge. Affirmed; Cross-appeal dismissed. Before Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132048 - 2017-09-21
: SCOTT R. NEEDHAM, Judge. Affirmed; Cross-appeal dismissed. Before Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132048 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
dismissal of a similar petition just prior to the filing of the instant petition. It is, of course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12169 - 2017-09-21
dismissal of a similar petition just prior to the filing of the instant petition. It is, of course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12169 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial, the State moved to dismiss the harassment charge, citing “evidentiary concerns” and asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
trial, the State moved to dismiss the harassment charge, citing “evidentiary concerns” and asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, they will be legally binding as not actionable and shall be dismissed. ¶4 In November 2008, formal charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75493 - 2011-12-20
, they will be legally binding as not actionable and shall be dismissed. ¶4 In November 2008, formal charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75493 - 2011-12-20
[PDF]
State v. George L. Wilson
to determine his motion to dismiss the citation. The trial court denied Wilson's motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7998 - 2017-09-19
to determine his motion to dismiss the citation. The trial court denied Wilson's motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7998 - 2017-09-19
State v. Wayne A. Sutton
of the maximum term of imprisonment for the charges that were dismissed but read in under the plea agreement
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21484 - 2006-02-21
of the maximum term of imprisonment for the charges that were dismissed but read in under the plea agreement
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21484 - 2006-02-21