Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12251 - 12260 of 60183 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 12251 - 12260 of 60183 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 19, 2013). In doing so, we rejected his claim that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173368 - 2017-09-21
-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 19, 2013). In doing so, we rejected his claim that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173368 - 2017-09-21
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
denial of Tratz’s request for costs in a small claims action in which he partially prevailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
denial of Tratz’s request for costs in a small claims action in which he partially prevailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel on direct appeal because his appellate counsel should have raised claims of ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573311 - 2022-10-04
counsel on direct appeal because his appellate counsel should have raised claims of ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573311 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
County of Marathon v. Troy Kuyoth
concluded that the County was barred from pursuing its allegations of zoning ordinance violations by claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12050 - 2017-09-21
concluded that the County was barred from pursuing its allegations of zoning ordinance violations by claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12050 - 2017-09-21
State v. David L. Gray
that Gray’s constitutional claims, including his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, are procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
that Gray’s constitutional claims, including his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, are procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
Hoida, Inc. v. M&I Midstate Bank
dismissing the claims of Hoida, Inc. (Hoida) against defendants M&I Midstate Bank (M&I) and McDonald Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25525 - 2017-09-21
dismissing the claims of Hoida, Inc. (Hoida) against defendants M&I Midstate Bank (M&I) and McDonald Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25525 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and claim preclusion. We agree the court erred, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229066 - 2018-12-05
and claim preclusion. We agree the court erred, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229066 - 2018-12-05
Mary Lou Mientke v. Marc A. Denzin
and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Mary Lou Mientke appeals a small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2446 - 2005-03-31
and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Mary Lou Mientke appeals a small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2446 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary Lou Mientke v. Marc A. Denzin
a small claims judgment.2 She claims that the trial court erred by requiring her to prove by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2446 - 2017-09-19
a small claims judgment.2 She claims that the trial court erred by requiring her to prove by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2446 - 2017-09-19
Miller Brewing Company v. Department of Industry
, JJ. SULLIVAN, J. At issue in this case is whether a claim under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7929 - 2005-03-31
, JJ. SULLIVAN, J. At issue in this case is whether a claim under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7929 - 2005-03-31