Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12261 - 12270 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12261 - 12270 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, STATS., is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Theriault, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21
of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, STATS., is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Theriault, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the historical facts to constitutional principles presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15
of the historical facts to constitutional principles presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Dane v. William S.
and application of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Milwaukee Cir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11243 - 2017-09-19
and application of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Milwaukee Cir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11243 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
violated the terms of a plea agreement is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Jackson, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378950 - 2021-06-23
violated the terms of a plea agreement is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Jackson, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378950 - 2021-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, PAUL RUSK, SHARON CORRIGAN, DAVID DE FELICE, GEORGE GILLIS, DOROTHY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240450 - 2019-05-09
COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, PAUL RUSK, SHARON CORRIGAN, DAVID DE FELICE, GEORGE GILLIS, DOROTHY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240450 - 2019-05-09
State v. Jacques Gibson
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Sammie L. Glass
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court decides de novo. See Spence v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15972 - 2017-09-21
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court decides de novo. See Spence v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15972 - 2017-09-21
C & B Investments v. Wisconsin Winnebago Health Department
We review de novo whether the agencies of the Winnebago Nation waived their sovereign immunity. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7705 - 2005-03-31
We review de novo whether the agencies of the Winnebago Nation waived their sovereign immunity. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo.” Id. To establish that the circuit court failed to conform with a mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156537 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo.” Id. To establish that the circuit court failed to conform with a mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156537 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Mentzel v. City of Oshkosh, 146 Wis. 2d 804, 808, 432 N.W.2d 609
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78777 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. Mentzel v. City of Oshkosh, 146 Wis. 2d 804, 808, 432 N.W.2d 609
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78777 - 2014-09-15