Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12271 - 12280 of 30019 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12271 - 12280 of 30019 for consulta de causas.
State v. Susan J. Seim
was deficient or whether the defense was prejudiced are questions of law that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12428 - 2005-03-31
was deficient or whether the defense was prejudiced are questions of law that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles R.P.
a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. William W., 180 Wis.2d 708, 713, 510 N.W.2d 718
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12887 - 2017-09-21
a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. William W., 180 Wis.2d 708, 713, 510 N.W.2d 718
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12887 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 912 (1998)). We review de novo whether a defendant was denied due process at sentencing. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157817 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 912 (1998)). We review de novo whether a defendant was denied due process at sentencing. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157817 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
are not in dispute, whether a judgment is void for lack of jurisdiction is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36120 - 2014-09-15
are not in dispute, whether a judgment is void for lack of jurisdiction is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36120 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Nathan appeals. Discussion ¶4 We review de novo whether the circuit court followed proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658241 - 2023-05-24
. Nathan appeals. Discussion ¶4 We review de novo whether the circuit court followed proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658241 - 2023-05-24
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
Mark Grebner v. Sharon Schiebel
interpret Wis. Stat. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2680 - 2005-03-31
interpret Wis. Stat. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2680 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Popke, 317 Wis. 2d 118, ¶10 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22
facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Popke, 317 Wis. 2d 118, ¶10 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Sheila K. LaFortune
de novo. State v. Erickson, 2003 WI App 43, ¶4, 260 Wis. 2d 279, 659 N.W.2d 407. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
de novo. State v. Erickson, 2003 WI App 43, ¶4, 260 Wis. 2d 279, 659 N.W.2d 407. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 207, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We then review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71767 - 2011-10-03
, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 207, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We then review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71767 - 2011-10-03