Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12271 - 12280 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12271 - 12280 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Brent A. Genz
of law, which we review de novo. See County of Jefferson v. Renz, 222 Wis.2d 424, 444, 588 N.W.2d 267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14963 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. See County of Jefferson v. Renz, 222 Wis.2d 424, 444, 588 N.W.2d 267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14963 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey Bland
review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18729 - 2005-06-27
review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18729 - 2005-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine Jones
to raise a question of fact necessitating a Machner hearing. This review is de novo. No. 94-2763
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8191 - 2017-09-19
to raise a question of fact necessitating a Machner hearing. This review is de novo. No. 94-2763
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8191 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Susan J. Dreyfus
on this appeal. No. 97-2473-CR 5 constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12943 - 2017-09-21
on this appeal. No. 97-2473-CR 5 constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12943 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric Johnson
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis.2d at 310, 458 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12223 - 2017-09-21
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis.2d at 310, 458 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12223 - 2017-09-21
State v. Arnold E. Lounsbury
facts, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Collett, 207 Wis.2d 319, 321, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
facts, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Collett, 207 Wis.2d 319, 321, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Chippewa Falls v. Town of Hallie
presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15316 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15316 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 169
and rules. Thus, our review is de novo. See State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶2, 305 Wis. 2d 722, 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34394 - 2008-11-11
and rules. Thus, our review is de novo. See State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶2, 305 Wis. 2d 722, 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34394 - 2008-11-11
State v. Charles Jones
a defendant’s right of confrontation is implicated, we review de novo whether admitting the hearsay statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
a defendant’s right of confrontation is implicated, we review de novo whether admitting the hearsay statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31