Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12271 - 12280 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
period prior to administering an Intoxilyzer test; and (3) the Intoxilyzer used by the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
test; and (3) the Intoxilyzer used by the officer was not approved for use by the proper authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12354 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
, and voluntary fashion. To address this issue, we apply the test set forth in Nelson v. State, 54 Wis. 2d 489
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169793 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
refused to submit to a chemical test of his breath following his arrest for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853209 - 2024-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause to ask Peterson to take a preliminary breath test under WIS. STAT. § 343.303. I therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744825 - 2024-01-11

[PDF] County of Jefferson v. Christopher D. Renz
for a preliminary breath test (PBT)? (3) If probable cause to arrest is required before the administration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13338 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey J. Jacobsen
” form to Jacobsen. ¶3 Initially, Jacobsen agreed to submit to the requested blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7006 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
gaze nystagmus (HGN) field sobriety test. For the reasons discussed below, I affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189017 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey J. Jacobsen
the Accused” form to Jacobsen. ¶3 Initially, Jacobsen agreed to submit to the requested blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7006 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Appleton v. David D. Stout
about whether to request an alternate chemical test. He also contends the jury delivered inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26303 - 2017-09-21