Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12281 - 12290 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12281 - 12290 of 30123 for de.
[PDF]
Mark Grebner v. Sharon Schiebel
. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2680 - 2017-09-19
. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2680 - 2017-09-19
State v. Allen Tony Davis
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id., 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15911 - 2005-03-31
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id., 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15911 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig T. Bates
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See Moats, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See Moats, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Traditional Design Works, Ltd. v. John McGourthy, Jr.
an issue of law which we review de novo. See Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13064 - 2017-09-21
an issue of law which we review de novo. See Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13064 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because I—I’m real sleep[-]de[p]rived without my medications, and I don’t—I don’t get hardly any sleep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110227 - 2017-09-21
because I—I’m real sleep[-]de[p]rived without my medications, and I don’t—I don’t get hardly any sleep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110227 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶13, 325 Wis. 2d 1, 784 N.W.2d 513. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-16
that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶13, 325 Wis. 2d 1, 784 N.W.2d 513. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-16
State v. Warren J. Hampton
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26265 - 2006-08-21
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26265 - 2006-08-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. On appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. On appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo.” Id. Here, we agree with the State that the facts found by the circuit court show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818007 - 2024-06-25
de novo.” Id. Here, we agree with the State that the facts found by the circuit court show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818007 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30