Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12281 - 12290 of 58518 for o j.
Search results 12281 - 12290 of 58518 for o j.
State v. James E. Robinson
recognized that “[t]o be impartial, a juror must be indifferent and capable of basing his or her verdict upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15425 - 2005-03-31
recognized that “[t]o be impartial, a juror must be indifferent and capable of basing his or her verdict upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15425 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Victor K. Johnson
143, 545 N.W.2d 840 (Ct. App. 1995). Haseltine explains that “[n]o witness, expert or otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5793 - 2017-09-19
143, 545 N.W.2d 840 (Ct. App. 1995). Haseltine explains that “[n]o witness, expert or otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5793 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
-Backed Certificates Series 2006-14, c/o BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59080 - 2011-01-19
-Backed Certificates Series 2006-14, c/o BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59080 - 2011-01-19
State v. Michael E. Stumps
in her “co[o]chie.” He denied having made the girl “suck his thing,” which he claimed the girl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19406 - 2005-08-24
in her “co[o]chie.” He denied having made the girl “suck his thing,” which he claimed the girl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19406 - 2005-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
for the same offense. U.S. Const. amend. V; Wisconsin Const. art. I, § 8. “[O]nce a defendant is placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144469 - 2015-07-20
for the same offense. U.S. Const. amend. V; Wisconsin Const. art. I, § 8. “[O]nce a defendant is placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144469 - 2015-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
he “g[o]t a clear look at [Lee]” when he introduced himself to Lee and was “100 percent” sure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33356 - 2008-07-15
he “g[o]t a clear look at [Lee]” when he introduced himself to Lee and was “100 percent” sure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33356 - 2008-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law” that we review independently. Id., ¶89. However, “[o]nce satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022587 - 2025-10-14
presents a question of law” that we review independently. Id., ¶89. However, “[o]nce satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022587 - 2025-10-14
State v. Vonnie D. Darby
the individual investigating Larsen’s criminal history had misspelled his name as L-A-R-S-O-N and, therefore, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2286 - 2005-03-31
the individual investigating Larsen’s criminal history had misspelled his name as L-A-R-S-O-N and, therefore, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2286 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Logan
, 607 N.W.2d 621. Thus, [t]o determine whether the entry was lawful, we must answer two questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6854 - 2017-09-20
, 607 N.W.2d 621. Thus, [t]o determine whether the entry was lawful, we must answer two questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6854 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App. 1996). A court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699950 - 2023-09-13
.” Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App. 1996). A court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699950 - 2023-09-13