Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 16410 for commentating.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 16410 for commentating.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The trial court responded: “All right. It’s preserved.” Winston’s counsel did not offer any comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
.” The trial court responded: “All right. It’s preserved.” Winston’s counsel did not offer any comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
. (Emphasis added.) The comments to Wis JI—Criminal 225 provide in relevant part: Discussions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58199 - 2010-12-27
. (Emphasis added.) The comments to Wis JI—Criminal 225 provide in relevant part: Discussions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58199 - 2010-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. The court’s comments thoroughly illuminated the reasons for the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181780 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision. The court’s comments thoroughly illuminated the reasons for the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181780 - 2017-09-21
State v. James A. Genett
). In its postconviction order, the trial court commented that “[i]n light of the [victim’s] clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12618 - 2005-03-31
). In its postconviction order, the trial court commented that “[i]n light of the [victim’s] clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12618 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven S. Walter
denying Walter’s motion to suppress without further comment. FACTS ¶3 The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16182 - 2005-03-31
denying Walter’s motion to suppress without further comment. FACTS ¶3 The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16182 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
can comment on. Nonetheless, Jason’s counsel suggested a three hour “window of opportunity” in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59536 - 2011-01-31
can comment on. Nonetheless, Jason’s counsel suggested a three hour “window of opportunity” in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59536 - 2011-01-31
State v. Joseph F. Jiles
alleged inaccurate information when it sentenced him. At sentencing, the trial court commented: In many
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4841 - 2005-03-31
alleged inaccurate information when it sentenced him. At sentencing, the trial court commented: In many
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4841 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the court’s sentencing comments suggests that the amount of revocation time in the Waukesha County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
in the court’s sentencing comments suggests that the amount of revocation time in the Waukesha County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
Oneida County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
subject to MERA. See id. Any comments about chief deputies must be read in the context of the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2280 - 2017-09-19
subject to MERA. See id. Any comments about chief deputies must be read in the context of the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2280 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Larry Howard
the living room and commented on Haskins’s presence. He then left the room, and Howard’s girlfriend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14167 - 2014-09-15
the living room and commented on Haskins’s presence. He then left the room, and Howard’s girlfriend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14167 - 2014-09-15