Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 30123 for de.
State v. Allan Lloyd Waldo
, our review is de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis. 2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774 (1996). Waldo tries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3655 - 2005-03-31
, our review is de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis. 2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774 (1996). Waldo tries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3655 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
was in violation of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, Stats., is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
was in violation of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, Stats., is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30039 - 2014-09-15
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30039 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. John A. Des Jardins Circuit Court Judge Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234701 - 2019-02-12
To: Hon. John A. Des Jardins Circuit Court Judge Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234701 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
State v. James H.
per month. ¶3 Fontella requested a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. In January 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
per month. ¶3 Fontella requested a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. In January 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Velle v. De Luca, 48 Wis. 2d 464, 467, 471, 180 N.W.2d 710 (1970) (upholding circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860497 - 2024-10-10
Velle v. De Luca, 48 Wis. 2d 464, 467, 471, 180 N.W.2d 710 (1970) (upholding circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860497 - 2024-10-10
State v. Douglas D. Schoepp
and interpretation, which we review de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis.2d 571, 577, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9524 - 2005-03-31
and interpretation, which we review de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis.2d 571, 577, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9524 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rickey Eugene Pinkard
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Badger State Bank v. Taylor, 2004 WI 128, ¶13, 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19522 - 2005-10-27
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Badger State Bank v. Taylor, 2004 WI 128, ¶13, 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19522 - 2005-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶21, 293 Wis. 2d at 612, 716 N.W.2d at 914. ¶6 Gordon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70084 - 2011-08-22
review de novo. See Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶21, 293 Wis. 2d at 612, 716 N.W.2d at 914. ¶6 Gordon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70084 - 2011-08-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
to de novo review. See City of Muskego v. Godec, 167 Wis. 2d 536, 545, 482 N.W.2d 79 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58236 - 2014-09-15
to de novo review. See City of Muskego v. Godec, 167 Wis. 2d 536, 545, 482 N.W.2d 79 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58236 - 2014-09-15