Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 41702 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 41702 for jury duty/1000.
State v. Brian C. Wegner
by the trial judge. Therefore, it is our duty to affirm the sentence on appeal. See McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
by the trial judge. Therefore, it is our duty to affirm the sentence on appeal. See McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Inc. v. Morgan Mc Cabe
is a duty of support owed under § 765.001(2), Stats.” St. Mary's Hosp. Medical Ctr. v. Brody, 186 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8460 - 2005-03-31
is a duty of support owed under § 765.001(2), Stats.” St. Mary's Hosp. Medical Ctr. v. Brody, 186 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 32
performance of his or her judicial duties and is performed outside of regular court hours or while the judge
/sc/rules/chap32.pdf - 2025-01-02
performance of his or her judicial duties and is performed outside of regular court hours or while the judge
/sc/rules/chap32.pdf - 2025-01-02
Mary Fredette v. Wood County National Bank
that the successor personal representative, the Wood County Trust Company,[2] breached its fiduciary duty to Frank's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8713 - 2005-03-31
that the successor personal representative, the Wood County Trust Company,[2] breached its fiduciary duty to Frank's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
not for investigative purposes but under a mandatory duty to report suspected child abuse. We do not find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
not for investigative purposes but under a mandatory duty to report suspected child abuse. We do not find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of M.A., Attorney Gray had a duty to refuse to draft a will in which she would receive a testamentary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211325 - 2018-04-18
of M.A., Attorney Gray had a duty to refuse to draft a will in which she would receive a testamentary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211325 - 2018-04-18
Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
to comply with § 101.11, Stats., the “safe place statute,” which, in relevant part, states: Employer’s duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13012 - 2005-03-31
to comply with § 101.11, Stats., the “safe place statute,” which, in relevant part, states: Employer’s duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13012 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Machotka v. Village of West Salem
No. 99-1163 4 of the routine duties of officers and employes whose responsibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15468 - 2017-09-21
No. 99-1163 4 of the routine duties of officers and employes whose responsibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15468 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kyle D. Willenkamp
) Has the law enforcement officer not met, or exceeded his or her duty under §§ 343.305(4) and 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2376 - 2005-03-31
) Has the law enforcement officer not met, or exceeded his or her duty under §§ 343.305(4) and 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2376 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shawano County v. Joann Redman
foreclosure proceedings. The trial court had no duty to recuse itself from Redman's March 11, 1993 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9868 - 2017-09-19
foreclosure proceedings. The trial court had no duty to recuse itself from Redman's March 11, 1993 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9868 - 2017-09-19