Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 61041 for quit claim deed/1000.

National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
) a taxpayer can file a refund claim under § 71.75(5), Stats., within two years of a field audit that resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12368 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions. He claims he is entitled to a new trial based upon the ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258179 - 2020-04-21

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment dismissing their negligence and safe place claims against Northeast Pharmacies, Inc., d/b/a Oconto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108043 - 2014-02-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to DOW Chemical Co. (Dow) and dismissing his claim on the merits, and with prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1128380 - 2026-06-10

[PDF] National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
§ 71.88, STATS.; and (2) a taxpayer can file a No. 97-1116 2 refund claim under § 71.75(5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12368 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
appeals an order dismissing its claim for relocation No. 2004AP3266 2 benefits in an eminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21367 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 63
dismissing on summary judgment her bad-faith claims against Partners Mutual Insurance Company. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81710 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
809.21. We further conclude that Leiser’s § 974.06 claims are barred, he has not presented a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261765 - 2020-05-27

Staci J. Schwittay v. Sheboygan Falls Mutual Ins. Co.
for subrogation claims is the statute of limitations on the underlying tort, because the running of that statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3005 - 2013-11-19

[PDF] Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
an arguable claim for the denial of their procedural rights. He expressly rejected their takings claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13746 - 2014-09-15