Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 63935 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 803, 810, 811; see also Wis. Stat. § 805.14(1).[1] [A]ppellate courts search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36019 - 2009-03-30

COURT OF APPEALS
record and when it based his sentence on an “uncorroborated” version of events. We reject Fayne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80618 - 2012-04-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806514 - 2024-05-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987058 - 2025-07-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 supplemental no-merit report, and upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887883 - 2024-12-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 supplemental report, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832965 - 2024-08-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 supplemental report, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832965 - 2024-08-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the reports, and we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14

Julie Marie Birschbach v. Gerald Eugene Birschbach
was entered in the trial court record as Exhibit 9 and set forth Gerald’s proposed division of the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4031 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
find nothing in the record indicating that the trial court here complied with its obligations under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83169 - 2012-05-30