Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12301 - 12310 of 40171 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 12301 - 12310 of 40171 for financial disclosure statements.
State v. Alfonzo P. Taylor
statements by three witnesses. Detectives testified that they did not keep their handwritten notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20303 - 2005-11-16
statements by three witnesses. Detectives testified that they did not keep their handwritten notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20303 - 2005-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Alfonzo P. Taylor
The State’s evidence included police reports of inculpatory pretrial statements by three witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20303 - 2017-09-21
The State’s evidence included police reports of inculpatory pretrial statements by three witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20303 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Harold S. Fields
discretion when it admitted Deng Yang’s hearsay statement into evidence during the testimony of a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14333 - 2014-09-15
discretion when it admitted Deng Yang’s hearsay statement into evidence during the testimony of a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14333 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tan Ngoc Nguyen
raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred by failing to suppress his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8907 - 2005-03-31
raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred by failing to suppress his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the evidence should be suppressed because his oral statements were part of the polygraph examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33867 - 2008-08-27
that the evidence should be suppressed because his oral statements were part of the polygraph examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33867 - 2008-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s pretrial rulings, jury selection, opening statements, evidentiary rulings during trial, Davis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787980 - 2024-04-11
court’s pretrial rulings, jury selection, opening statements, evidentiary rulings during trial, Davis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787980 - 2024-04-11
State v. Esteban R.M.
was interviewed at the police station about such conduct. A written statement was produced and signed by Esteban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11895 - 2005-03-31
was interviewed at the police station about such conduct. A written statement was produced and signed by Esteban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11895 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. Compton
his motion to suppress his statement given to police because he invoked his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7087 - 2005-03-31
his motion to suppress his statement given to police because he invoked his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7087 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
statements were part of the polygraph examination, and therefore are not admissible. ¶5 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33867 - 2014-09-15
statements were part of the polygraph examination, and therefore are not admissible. ¶5 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33867 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Compton
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement given to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7087 - 2017-09-20
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement given to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7087 - 2017-09-20