Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12311 - 12320 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Interpretation of a statute is an issue we review de novo. Waukesha Cnty. v. Steven H., 2000 WI 28, ¶16, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93259 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
5 constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28421 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is available to Key is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. “Writ of habeas corpus is an equitable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238014 - 2019-03-27

State v. Anthony A. Kasparec
is de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 712, 345 N.W.2d 457, 463 (1984). The record must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2005-03-31

State v. Russell Stokes
determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial is reviewed de novo. Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31

William B. Diel v. State of Wisconsin-Labor and Industry Review Commission
the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel contests LIRC’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2780 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
support under these circumstances. Hughes requested de novo review. After a hearing on February 7
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607134 - 2023-01-04

[PDF] State v. Andrew D. Wielunski
that this court's review is de novo because a question of law is presented. The State argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14794 - 2017-09-21

[PDF]
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Second, if a new factor exists, the circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898626 - 2025-01-09

Patricia v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Dipasquale v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10342 - 2005-03-31