Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12311 - 12320 of 73032 for we.
Search results 12311 - 12320 of 73032 for we.
COURT OF APPEALS
calculation. We affirm. ¶2 Mark and Dawn were married twenty-three years. At the time of the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52029 - 2010-07-12
calculation. We affirm. ¶2 Mark and Dawn were married twenty-three years. At the time of the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52029 - 2010-07-12
State v. David M. Beasley
trial in the interest of justice. We reject Beasley's arguments and, accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8155 - 2005-03-31
trial in the interest of justice. We reject Beasley's arguments and, accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8155 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by deferring to the family court presiding over the Hoerigs’ divorce action, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75146 - 2011-12-12
by deferring to the family court presiding over the Hoerigs’ divorce action, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75146 - 2011-12-12
Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
challenge to the Village of DeForest’s weed ordinance must fail. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14325 - 2005-03-31
challenge to the Village of DeForest’s weed ordinance must fail. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14325 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel; and (2) that we should reverse because the credibility of the victim’s sexual abuse accusations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33494 - 2008-07-23
of counsel; and (2) that we should reverse because the credibility of the victim’s sexual abuse accusations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33494 - 2008-07-23
State v. Sandy Pegues
suggestive. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment. On May 18, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9112 - 2005-03-31
suggestive. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment. On May 18, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070443 - 2026-02-03
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070443 - 2026-02-03
State v. Robert Fecke
in the interest of justice. We reject each of Fecke’s claims and affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
in the interest of justice. We reject each of Fecke’s claims and affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369231 - 2021-05-26
, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369231 - 2021-05-26
[PDF]
State v. Jacquelyn J. Dingeldein
the information of her husband. We reverse and remand. ¶2 The complaint charged Dingeldein with one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21632 - 2017-09-21
the information of her husband. We reverse and remand. ¶2 The complaint charged Dingeldein with one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21632 - 2017-09-21