Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 16451 for commentating.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 16451 for commentating.
[PDF]
State v. Angelo J. Ewing
this morning is I’m leaving that up to the Court. I’m going to be commenting on the factors the Court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4196 - 2017-09-19
this morning is I’m leaving that up to the Court. I’m going to be commenting on the factors the Court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4196 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The trial court responded: “All right. It’s preserved.” Winston’s counsel did not offer any comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
.” The trial court responded: “All right. It’s preserved.” Winston’s counsel did not offer any comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Sergeant Ropicky comment upon whether Bray passed or failed any of the field sobriety tests. Nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28
Sergeant Ropicky comment upon whether Bray passed or failed any of the field sobriety tests. Nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
; and the testimony of the officer at the jail that he overheard Trinka comment, “[D]ing dong pissed me off … so I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105728 - 2013-12-17
; and the testimony of the officer at the jail that he overheard Trinka comment, “[D]ing dong pissed me off … so I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105728 - 2013-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court commented that “the most important fact in this whole scenario is you put 13 or 14
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534021 - 2022-06-21
, the circuit court commented that “the most important fact in this whole scenario is you put 13 or 14
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534021 - 2022-06-21
State v. Jerry J. Wintlend
). As one commentator noted, “[i]t would be paradoxical indeed for individuals to claim that they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5140 - 2005-03-31
). As one commentator noted, “[i]t would be paradoxical indeed for individuals to claim that they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
comments to Reifenberg were ambiguous, that creates a material factual dispute because other evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
comments to Reifenberg were ambiguous, that creates a material factual dispute because other evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
and a criminal trial. In its opening statement, the State commented: “I am going to remind you again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6140 - 2005-03-31
and a criminal trial. In its opening statement, the State commented: “I am going to remind you again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstance” based on an unidentified recruiter’s comments, which he conceded contained “no specifics.” ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35766 - 2009-03-10
circumstance” based on an unidentified recruiter’s comments, which he conceded contained “no specifics.” ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35766 - 2009-03-10
State v. Robert K.
granted within the applicable time limits. The following comment from Quinsanna applies equally here: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31
granted within the applicable time limits. The following comment from Quinsanna applies equally here: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31