Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 30175 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75824 - 2011-12-28

[PDF] The Shelby Insurance Company v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15181 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 10
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27896 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Shawn E. Avery
, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4227 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Monika Gasper v. Andrew and Nancy Parbs
requires us to construe WIS. STAT. § 174.02(1)(b) and apply it to undisputed facts. We do this de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3018 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Menomonee Falls v. Paul G. Meyer
of statutory construction which we review de novo. See State v. C.A.J., 148 Wis.2d 137, 139, 434 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14758 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
The Honorable Linda M. Van De Water imposed Mayberry’s sentence. No. 2022AP1263-CR 3 reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680068 - 2023-07-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229383 - 2018-12-11

[PDF] NOTICE
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and review constitutional issues de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44984 - 2014-09-15