Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 46105 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 46105 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Charles L. Klaeser
(OWI).[1] He contends that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of a chemical test because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12234 - 2005-03-31
(OWI).[1] He contends that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of a chemical test because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12234 - 2005-03-31
City of New Berlin v. Timothy J. Goba
evidence of his BAC test result. He bases this on two arguments: (1) he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11341 - 2005-03-31
evidence of his BAC test result. He bases this on two arguments: (1) he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11341 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Klaeser
He contends that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of a chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21
He contends that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of a chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William W. Gandt
the results of the intoxilyzer test; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
the results of the intoxilyzer test; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
State v. William W. Gandt
the results of the intoxilyzer test; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
the results of the intoxilyzer test; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests 1 This appeal is decided by one judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91641 - 2014-09-15
sobriety tests 1 This appeal is decided by one judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91641 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark G. Bargenquast
evidence, contending that the arresting officer erroneously administered a preliminary breath test (PBT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2005-03-31
evidence, contending that the arresting officer erroneously administered a preliminary breath test (PBT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark G. Bargenquast
officer erroneously administered a preliminary breath test (PBT) because the requisite probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14543 - 2017-09-21
officer erroneously administered a preliminary breath test (PBT) because the requisite probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14543 - 2017-09-21
City of New London v. James E. Knaus
of the result of a blood-alcohol test at his jury trial, he waived his right to challenge the City of New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4809 - 2005-03-31
of the result of a blood-alcohol test at his jury trial, he waived his right to challenge the City of New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4809 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roman G. Brotz
to the blood alcohol testing procedures authorized under the implied consent law. He argues that the margin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10002 - 2005-03-31
to the blood alcohol testing procedures authorized under the implied consent law. He argues that the margin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10002 - 2005-03-31