Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 58532 for speedy trial.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 58532 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Dion W. Demmerly
the reenactment at trial. Demmerly claims he was prejudiced by this evidence that violated his discovery demand
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11055 - 2017-09-19
the reenactment at trial. Demmerly claims he was prejudiced by this evidence that violated his discovery demand
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11055 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will generally not entertain issues not raised below. Second, a review of the record reveals the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180489 - 2017-09-21
will generally not entertain issues not raised below. Second, a review of the record reveals the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180489 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
the trial court’s finding that Uselmann breached the contract No. 2005AP1625 2 and Klinzing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24798 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s finding that Uselmann breached the contract No. 2005AP1625 2 and Klinzing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24798 - 2017-09-21
Jessica A. Rusch v. Adam D. Steinke
affirm the trial court’s order in all respects. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated to a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
affirm the trial court’s order in all respects. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated to a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We uphold the trial court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108055 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We uphold the trial court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108055 - 2017-09-21
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
. ¶1 DYKMAN, P.J.[1] Debra J.A. appeals from trial court orders terminating her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2189 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 DYKMAN, P.J.[1] Debra J.A. appeals from trial court orders terminating her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2189 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith Jones
. After a joint jury trial, Patterson was acquitted but Jones was found guilty. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14140 - 2005-03-31
. After a joint jury trial, Patterson was acquitted but Jones was found guilty. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
robbery, as party to a crime (PTAC). He contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87593 - 2012-10-02
robbery, as party to a crime (PTAC). He contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87593 - 2012-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Joseph H. Gray
for a new trial without a hearing. On appeal, Gray challenges the denial of No. 2004AP3169-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21482 - 2017-09-21
for a new trial without a hearing. On appeal, Gray challenges the denial of No. 2004AP3169-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21482 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was that Janasik was the driver. His first trial ended in a hung jury. A second jury found him guilty. Eckstein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108236 - 2014-02-25
was that Janasik was the driver. His first trial ended in a hung jury. A second jury found him guilty. Eckstein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108236 - 2014-02-25