Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 12321 - 12330 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
first trial ended in a hung jury. A second jury found him guilty. Eckstein filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21
first trial ended in a hung jury. A second jury found him guilty. Eckstein filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21
Jessica A. Rusch v. Adam D. Steinke
affirm the trial court’s order in all respects. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated to a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
affirm the trial court’s order in all respects. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated to a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Wilder
and searched him for weapons. The trial court denied his motion to suppress.1 We affirm. I. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10563 - 2017-09-20
and searched him for weapons. The trial court denied his motion to suppress.1 We affirm. I. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10563 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
] We uphold the trial court’s rulings on Adams’ motions to suppress and for dismissal and affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108055 - 2014-02-10
] We uphold the trial court’s rulings on Adams’ motions to suppress and for dismissal and affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108055 - 2014-02-10
State v. Katrina D. Campbell
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.03(2)(b) (2001-02).[1] Campbell claims the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.03(2)(b) (2001-02).[1] Campbell claims the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 153
of the plea colloquy and alleges that it was deficient, in part because the trial court did not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55951 - 2014-09-15
of the plea colloquy and alleges that it was deficient, in part because the trial court did not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55951 - 2014-09-15
State v. Allen D. Mechtel
was invalid under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). The trial court found probable cause and issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8252 - 2005-03-31
was invalid under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). The trial court found probable cause and issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8252 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie G.
. Affirmed. SCHUDSON, J.[1] Frankie G. appeals from the non-final trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9350 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. SCHUDSON, J.[1] Frankie G. appeals from the non-final trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9350 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
finding that Dorothy was a child in need of protection and services. They argue: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30488 - 2007-10-01
finding that Dorothy was a child in need of protection and services. They argue: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30488 - 2007-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) the State did not provide Krech’s trial counsel with the forensic analysis that police performed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
) the State did not provide Krech’s trial counsel with the forensic analysis that police performed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10