Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12331 - 12340 of 68393 for did.
Search results 12331 - 12340 of 68393 for did.
Brigitte A. Buchmeier v. Lloyd Buchmeier, Jr.
should not address this argument because Lloyd did not raise it at trial and, in any event, his assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19387 - 2005-08-24
should not address this argument because Lloyd did not raise it at trial and, in any event, his assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19387 - 2005-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In 2007, Prude filed a pro se motion for plea withdrawal, alleging he did not understand the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105382 - 2017-09-21
In 2007, Prude filed a pro se motion for plea withdrawal, alleging he did not understand the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105382 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel did and the basis for the challenged conduct will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15
counsel did and the basis for the challenged conduct will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that he thought he was purchasing marijuana, the trial court did not prohibit Ford from making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29737 - 2007-07-16
that he thought he was purchasing marijuana, the trial court did not prohibit Ford from making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29737 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon L. Norton
to a first offense penalty because the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9505 - 2017-09-19
to a first offense penalty because the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9505 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jonathon L. Norton
penalty because the State did not adequately prove the prior OMVWI convictions. We disagree and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9505 - 2005-03-31
penalty because the State did not adequately prove the prior OMVWI convictions. We disagree and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9505 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bradford Lescher
) the trial court did not “understand the proper legal definition of `in concert', and did not correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8059 - 2017-09-19
) the trial court did not “understand the proper legal definition of `in concert', and did not correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8059 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), No. 2012AP1955, unpublished op. and order (WI App Jun. 12, 2013). In that decision, we noted that Hessil did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
), No. 2012AP1955, unpublished op. and order (WI App Jun. 12, 2013). In that decision, we noted that Hessil did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Garth E. Coates
discretion. In his response, Coates argues that the State did not present sufficient credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8747 - 2017-09-19
discretion. In his response, Coates argues that the State did not present sufficient credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8747 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
with children again.” The appellants alleged that the Milwaukee Archdiocese did not contact the police or warn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27263 - 2006-11-27
with children again.” The appellants alleged that the Milwaukee Archdiocese did not contact the police or warn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27263 - 2006-11-27