Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
State v. James R. Bolstad
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8483 - 2005-03-31
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8483 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wade T. Jones
Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2251 - 2017-09-19
Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2251 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. State v. McAlister, 2018 WI 34, ¶25, 380 Wis. 2d 684, 911 N.W.2d 77. We review that issue de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432639 - 2021-09-29
. State v. McAlister, 2018 WI 34, ¶25, 380 Wis. 2d 684, 911 N.W.2d 77. We review that issue de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432639 - 2021-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of “whether the facts as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147170 - 2017-09-21
of “whether the facts as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147170 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to proceed is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶7. ¶15 WISCONSIN STAT. § 227.53(1)(a)2 states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26639 - 2014-09-15
to proceed is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶7. ¶15 WISCONSIN STAT. § 227.53(1)(a)2 states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26639 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Monroe v. Steven L. Furgason
. The constitutionality of an ordinance is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Wilke v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12282 - 2017-09-21
. The constitutionality of an ordinance is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Wilke v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Keith Jones
on a lesser-included offense should have been given is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14140 - 2014-09-15
on a lesser-included offense should have been given is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14140 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Melissa Frank v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company
accordingly. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9080 - 2017-09-19
accordingly. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9080 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264312 - 2020-06-16
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264312 - 2020-06-16