Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 49819 for our.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 49819 for our.
[PDF]
Linda L. Koziara v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
to our order of June 4, 2002, this case was placed on the expedited appeals calendar. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5251 - 2017-09-19
to our order of June 4, 2002, this case was placed on the expedited appeals calendar. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5251 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The State fails to file a brief in this appeal, despite our order of March 9, 2020, cautioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256684 - 2020-03-17
The State fails to file a brief in this appeal, despite our order of March 9, 2020, cautioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256684 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
Kathy Davis v. Jodine Deppisch
confirm the findings of the adjustment committee. ¶4 Our review of the action of the prison adjustment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21463 - 2017-09-21
confirm the findings of the adjustment committee. ¶4 Our review of the action of the prison adjustment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21463 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2311 - 2017-09-19
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2311 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
and whether the sentence was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110531 - 2014-04-22
and whether the sentence was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110531 - 2014-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286081 - 2020-09-10
arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286081 - 2020-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision and order denying his postconviction motion without a Machner1 hearing. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632883 - 2023-03-14
decision and order denying his postconviction motion without a Machner1 hearing. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632883 - 2023-03-14
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124783 - 2014-10-16
denying his postconviction motions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124783 - 2014-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record. Our independent review of the record did not disclose any arguably meritorious issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259606 - 2020-05-06
the record. Our independent review of the record did not disclose any arguably meritorious issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259606 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251073 - 2019-12-05
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251073 - 2019-12-05