Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 59342 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] Civil disposition summary: County and district
0 7 Large Claims Garnishment 4 5 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 Amortization of Debt/Wage Earner 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispocounty17.pdf - 2018-02-09

[PDF] Civil disposition summary: by county and district
0 0 0 Large Claims Garnishment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Amortization of Debt/Wage Earner 5 5 0 0 1 2 0 2 41
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispocounty14.pdf - 2015-03-05

[PDF] Begin Date:
0 0 11 Large Claims Garnishment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Amortization of Debt/Wage Earner 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispocounty13.pdf - 2014-03-24

[PDF] Civil disposition summary: County and district
1 0 19 Large Claims Garnishment 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Amortization of Debt/Wage Earner 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 4
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispocounty16.pdf - 2018-02-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by contractor. After a jury found in favor of Soria on those claims, both Custom Homes and Soria appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458991 - 2022-01-28

COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief which was based on a claim of ineffectiveness of postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13

[PDF] Robert K. Rowe v. Attorneys' Liability Assurance Society, Inc.
. Robert E. Sutton appeals from an order1 dismissing his action to enforce what he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13117 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. He also made claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a denial of equal protection and substantive due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242086 - 2019-06-19

Robert K. Rowe v. Attorneys' Liability Assurance Society, Inc.
] dismissing his action to enforce what he claimed was an attorney’s lien against proceeds in a settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13117 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion in not holding an evidentiary hearing on this claim and did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886263 - 2024-12-11