Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 58506 for speedy trial.

Jessica A. Rusch v. Adam D. Steinke
affirm the trial court’s order in all respects. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated to a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21

CA Blank Order
] We uphold the trial court’s rulings on Adams’ motions to suppress and for dismissal and affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108055 - 2014-02-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his reverse- waiver petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87593 - 2014-09-15

State v. Joseph H. Gray
and from a circuit court order denying his motion for a new trial without a hearing. On appeal, Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21482 - 2006-02-21

[PDF] State v. Devontes D. Harris
on inadequate proof; (2) the prosecutor engaged in misconduct; and (3) his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18848 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gary L. Radloff
of counsel. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel by counsel’s inadequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7429 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We uphold the trial court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108055 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
. PASELL, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DYKMAN, P.J.1 Debra J.A. appeals from trial court orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2190 - 2017-09-19

James P. Watkins v. William G. Eastman
for psychological help." Watkins later amended the amount claimed to $150,000. The trial court granted a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7979 - 2005-03-31

State v. Katrina D. Campbell
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.03(2)(b) (2001-02).[1] Campbell claims the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31