Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 73646 for we.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 73646 for we.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Baskerville’s motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131916 - 2017-09-21
Baskerville’s motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131916 - 2017-09-21
State v. Melody L. Dallman
to do so. We hold that it did not. We reverse and remand with directions. ¶2 On June 16, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18131 - 2005-05-10
to do so. We hold that it did not. We reverse and remand with directions. ¶2 On June 16, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18131 - 2005-05-10
[PDF]
County of Sheboygan v. Rodney G.R.
our independent review of the record, we are satisfied that the trial court applied the correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4953 - 2017-09-19
our independent review of the record, we are satisfied that the trial court applied the correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4953 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
is ambiguous and illusory; and (4) the assault and battery exclusion is ambiguous. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32426 - 2008-04-14
is ambiguous and illusory; and (4) the assault and battery exclusion is ambiguous. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32426 - 2008-04-14
State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
was not approved for use by the proper authority. We conclude that the officer had probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
was not approved for use by the proper authority. We conclude that the officer had probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Baskerville’s motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131916 - 2014-12-15
Baskerville’s motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131916 - 2014-12-15
WI App 146 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1377-CR Complete Titl...
upon proper factors or provide reasoned explanations for its imposition of the surcharge. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72346 - 2011-11-28
upon proper factors or provide reasoned explanations for its imposition of the surcharge. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72346 - 2011-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Sheets
., permits a trial court to order installation on only one vehicle owned by a convicted defendant. We deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8853 - 2017-09-19
., permits a trial court to order installation on only one vehicle owned by a convicted defendant. We deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8853 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentence and his motion for relief from postconviction orders entered in 2006. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35260 - 2014-09-15
sentence and his motion for relief from postconviction orders entered in 2006. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35260 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence and his motion for relief from postconviction orders entered in 2006. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
sentence and his motion for relief from postconviction orders entered in 2006. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20