Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12341 - 12350 of 20941 for word.

[PDF] WI APP 42
in the words it used. Id. “If we conclude the statutory language is plain, then we apply its plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109611 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
noted, “Most buildings don’t have a buildup of ice creating a hazard. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63364 - 2014-09-15

State v. Fairly W. Earls
the confused and muddled and unprovable words of a child.” Defense counsel also stated that J.M.O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2953 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
defined phrase in the statute. Rather, we looked to the common meanings of the words ‘expectation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138974 - 2015-04-07

State v. Anthony Mark Caravella
to run the sentences consecutively -- in the words of Gallion at ¶42 to “explain, in light of the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24944 - 2006-05-01

State v. Robert Gordon
but police officers as well—even when the officers have, to use Justice Benjamin Nathan Cardozo's word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8670 - 2005-03-31

State v. Wayne R. Anderson
contained in the report. And the words of the trial court tell us that the court relied on those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13168 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to the magic words, “maximum sentence,” it explained that its sentence and sentence structure was designed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50287 - 2010-05-24

COURT OF APPEALS
of words or other expressions, to commit first-degree intentional homicide. See id.; see also Wis JI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86128 - 2012-08-21

State v. Willie M. Kendricks
to each checked “guilty” box. Thus, although the words spoken at the plea colloquy, standing alone, do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5177 - 2005-03-31