Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12351 - 12360 of 82980 for simple case search.
Search results 12351 - 12360 of 82980 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246829 - 2019-09-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246829 - 2019-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, we do not retry cases. Maclin v. State, 92 Wis. 2d 323, 332, 284 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106847 - 2014-01-21
the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, we do not retry cases. Maclin v. State, 92 Wis. 2d 323, 332, 284 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106847 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. The police asked Cancel, who owned the home, for permission to search her home, which Cancel granted both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54139 - 2010-09-07
. The police asked Cancel, who owned the home, for permission to search her home, which Cancel granted both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54139 - 2010-09-07
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
unreasonable searches and seizures.” While an investigative stop is technically a “seizure” under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7597 - 2005-03-31
unreasonable searches and seizures.” While an investigative stop is technically a “seizure” under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7597 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelsey C.R.
that the person is not armed. Accordingly, he asked a female police officer to meet them to do a pat-down search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16246 - 2005-03-31
that the person is not armed. Accordingly, he asked a female police officer to meet them to do a pat-down search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16246 - 2005-03-31
Leo E. Wanta v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
number, and the revenue agent who authored the letter could not have been referring to a record search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20247 - 2005-11-14
number, and the revenue agent who authored the letter could not have been referring to a record search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20247 - 2005-11-14
State v. David L. Gray
of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures;[2] (2) his trial counsel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures;[2] (2) his trial counsel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7598 - 2017-09-19
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7598 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a financial institution charge in another case were dismissed as read-ins. Loewe received the maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116989 - 2017-09-21
a financial institution charge in another case were dismissed as read-ins. Loewe received the maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116989 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” Id., ¶20 (footnote omitted). Whether Tillman’s procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44870 - 2009-12-21
the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” Id., ¶20 (footnote omitted). Whether Tillman’s procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44870 - 2009-12-21