Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12361 - 12370 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12361 - 12370 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
presents an issue of law subject to de novo review. Ehlinger v. Hauser, 2010 WI 54, ¶47, 325 Wis. 2d 287
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117397 - 2014-07-21
presents an issue of law subject to de novo review. Ehlinger v. Hauser, 2010 WI 54, ¶47, 325 Wis. 2d 287
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117397 - 2014-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
. As such, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Kwiatkowski v. Capitol Indem. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11760 - 2017-09-20
. As such, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Kwiatkowski v. Capitol Indem. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11760 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
and presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 697, 551
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18075 - 2017-09-21
and presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 697, 551
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Pulera now appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204744 - 2017-12-07
. Pulera now appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204744 - 2017-12-07
Heidi Lyn Cvicker v. Stephen Donald Cvicker
commissioner on Stephen’s motion for a reduction in child support. Stephen then sought a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13223 - 2005-03-31
commissioner on Stephen’s motion for a reduction in child support. Stephen then sought a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13223 - 2005-03-31
Riviera Airport, Inc. v. Pierce County
the interpretation of the riverway zoning ordinance, a question of law that we review de novo. See Welter v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15904 - 2005-03-31
the interpretation of the riverway zoning ordinance, a question of law that we review de novo. See Welter v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15904 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29
State v. Mark L. Stewart
subject to de novo review. Id., ¶10. ¶7 In State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21509 - 2006-02-22
subject to de novo review. Id., ¶10. ¶7 In State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21509 - 2006-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶14 Trial counsel explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72316 - 2011-10-18
was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶14 Trial counsel explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72316 - 2011-10-18